HINDU LAW IN HINDI PDF

adminComment(0)
    Contents:

Chapter. I —The Sources of Hindu Law. „. II—Benami Transactions and. The Law of Damdupat. BOOK n. The Law of Status or Personal and Family relations. Publisher: Allahabad Law Agency Publication, Allahabad. ENTANSİF HİNDİ YETİŞTİRİCİLİĞİ İŞLETMELERİNDE KÂRLILIK VE VERİMLİLİK ANALİZLERİ (ANALYSIS OF PROFITA Reply to E. Avisar, H. Kuerer, L. Livi et al, and E. Hindie et al. Hindu Law eBook & Lecture Notes PDF Download (garfstontanguicon.tk - India's Biggest Website for Law Study Material Downloads). I have taken this file from.


Hindu Law In Hindi Pdf

Author:LETA MUHTASEB
Language:English, Arabic, Hindi
Country:Albania
Genre:Biography
Pages:299
Published (Last):24.10.2015
ISBN:788-2-67732-328-4
ePub File Size:22.45 MB
PDF File Size:11.34 MB
Distribution:Free* [*Register to download]
Downloads:45425
Uploaded by: DESIREE

I. Introductory. In India each community has its own family law. Hindus, the majority community, have their separate family laws; so have the Muslims, the biggest. An Act to amend and codify the law relating to marriage among Hindus. person would not have been governed by the Hindu law or by any custom or usage. A Human Rights Contribution to Hinduism and a Hindu Contribution to Human Rights. File Size: kb. File Type: pdf. Download File. Hinduism and Human.

Marthamma argued that Moonuswami was a Christian and their was no provision of reconversion into Hinduism. The Court decided that reconversion was possible and marriage was legal one. Discuss the position of 'Srutis' and 'Smritis' as the sources of Hindu Law. Define Custom and enumerate the various kinds of customs. What are the essentials of a valid custom under Hindu Law? Property" and 'Separate Property'. Discuss the rights of the Karta.

Discuss the difference between 'Joint Family. Institution of marriage has a paramount status in the social life of Hindus. It is one of the oldest institutions. According to Raghunandan 'The acceptance of bride as his wife by the bridegroom in a gift by her parents is defined as marriage. By marriage man and woman are united into a wedlock. A Hindu marriage is looked upon as something which is more of a religious necessity and less of a physical luxury. Marriage is also necessary among Hindus because all the religious ceremonies and rites are to be performed in the companionship of his wife a.

A marriage is the union of. It is a union which is indissoluble. As long as her husband is alive, the. A wife is enjoined to regard him as her God; likewise, the wife is declared to be half the body of her husband. Man is only half, not. The wife is the source of Dharma, Artha and Kama, and she is also the source of Moksha.

K According to Manu, the daughter is given in marriage only once and she remains the wife of that person to whom she is given in marriage for her whole life.

According to Narada and Parasara, there are only five conditions in which a wife could abandon her husband and remarry - 1. But these conditions could be allowed only in the case of unapproved form of marriage.

Marriage is a tie which once tied cannot be untied. It is sacramental union and continues to exist even after the enactment of the Hindu Marriage Act. On the other hand, Manu shows that it is actually a gift of the bride. Thus, an essential part of the marriage ceremony is what is called Kanyadan and it fulfills all the requirements of a gift under the Hindu Law.

It is. Purshottamdas v Purshottamdasthe1 Court observed that Marriage of Hindu children is a contract made by their parents. Muthusami v Masilaman3 i, A marriage, whatever else it is, i. U S Anjona Dasi v Ghose, The suits relating to marriage deal with that which in the eye of the law must be treated as a civil contract, and important civil rights arise out of that contract. On the basis of above mentioned and other cases, it can safely be concluded that under the ancient, uncodified Hindu Law, a Hindu marriage was not only a sacrament, but also a contract.

In the present Hindu Marriage Act, since now a provision has been made for a divorce by mutual consent, it also indicates that marriage is a contract dissoluble by mutual consent. Monogamy has been introduced and provided punishment for bigamy. The Act does not recognise any particular form of marriage but prescribes some conditions.

Registration of Hindu Marriage. Restitution of conjugal rights. The provision of divorce and the concept of divorce by mutual consent.

Hindu Laws PDF Download

The provision of re-marriage. Legitimacy of a child born out of either void or voidable marriage. Provision for the custody of children during the pendency of legal proceeding and even after the passing of decree.

Conditions of a Valid Marriage under the Act: There are five conditions of marriage enshrined under Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, in absence of which the marriage will not be deemed to be a valid marriage. According to Section 5 a marriage may be solemnised between any two Hindus, if the following conditions are fulfilled, namely: U S If marriage contravenes anyone of the conditions under clause i , iv and v , the marriage is null and tr'oid while contravention of the condition under clause ii renders marriage voidable.

The Act does not provide for the situation where clause iii is violated. However, it has been held that violation of the condition under. Section 5 i recognises the principle of monogamy and prohibits bigamy.

Section 11 makes a bigamous marriage void and Section 17 makes it a. Jayamma, it was held that Section 5 read with Section 17 rendering a bigamous marriage. In Smt. Yamuna Bai Anand Rao Adhav v. Anant Rao Shiva Ram Adhava. M event of breach of first condition specified in Section 5 1 the marriage is rendered null and void under. But In. A marriage in contravention of Section 6 i is void even though it is not declared to be void. In case where in her own suit, the wife has obtained a declaration that her husband could remarry during her life time, the marriage of her husband with another woman would be illegal despite the consent of his first wife and giving such declaratory relief by the court concerned would be erroneous and illegal.

Despite want of appropriate provision to the effect in the Hindu Marriage Act, , any party to the marriage could be restrained from remarrying under the appropriate order of injunction. This was so held in Uma Shankar v. Rajdevi, and Shankerappa v. Vassappa, According to this clause one of the conditions for a Hindu marriage is that neither party must be suffering from unsoundness of mind, mental disorder, insanity or epilepsy at the time of marriage.

Section 12 1 b renders at the instance of aggrieved party, the marriage voidable. Alka Sharma v. Avinash Chandra has laid down that the word 'and' between expression unfit for marriage. The court can nullify the marriage if either condition or both conditions contemplated exist due to mental disorder making the living together of parties highly unhappy.

It was also held in this case that the word "procreation" implies within it not only capacity to give birth to children but also to look after them as well as so as to bring them up. From the use of the expression "has been suffering" under clause c it is clear that it is not necessary that a person should be insane or suffering from epilepsy at the time of marriage. It is sufficient if he or she had been subject to recurrent attacks of insanity or epilepsy.

Age of the Parties: Clause iii as amended by the Child Marriage Restraint Amendment Act, prescribes the age of the bridegroom and bride as 21 years and 18 years respectively to have capacity for solemnising a Hindu Marriage.

But the marriage in contravention of the age limits can neither be void nor. S voidable, though it is punishable under Section The Supreme Court also observed in Lila Gupta v. Lakshminarayan S.

U Prohibition as to prohibited Degrees of Relationship and Sapindas: Clause iv lays down the condition that the parties to a Hindu Marriage should not be within the degrees of prohibited relationship unless the custom or usage governing each of them permits of a marriage between the two, whereas under. K clause v the parties should not be sapindas of each other.

The expressions 'degrees of prohibited. M of the Act. Proving one instance where marriage took place in contravention of either of these clauses is not. The Hindu Marriage Act. A performance of ceremonies for a lawful marriage. It gives statutory recognition to the marriage under the.

Section 7 of the Act provides for the ceremonies of a Hindu marriage as follows:. Where such rites and ceremonies include the saptapadi i. The section speaks of solemnisation of marriage in accordance with customary rites and ceremonies.

The word "solemnised" means to celebrate the marriage with proper ceremonies with the intention that the parties should be considered to be married. In Bhaurao v. State of Maharashtra S. Further, under the section it is sufficient if the marriage is solemnised in accordance with customary rites and ceremonies of either party. It is not necessary that the customary rites and ceremonies of both the parties should be followed.

In Asrabai v. Dhondiram where a marriage is performed according to the customary rites and ceremonies of one party which did not include Saptapadi even though according to. Factum Valet.: In certain cases it is presumed that the necessary rites and ceremonies have been followed to constitute a valid marriage.

This is known as doctrine of factum valet. Under the old law, ",'here the factum of marriage is established the doctrine of factum valet was applied and a valid '1larriage was presumed. Even after this Act such a presumption can be drawn in appropriate cases. Registration of Hindu Marriage: In order to faciliate proof of a Hindu marriage Section 8 of the Act provides that the State government is authorised to make rules for the purpose of registration of -narriages.

S as there are various customary forms of marriage in different communities among the Hindus and it would difficult to prove such customary forms. Such rules must inter alia proVide that the parties to any such marriage may have the particulars relating to their marriage entered in the marriage register in such manner and subject to such conditions as may be prescribed.

It was held in Kishan Paul v. Ashok Kumar Pal U HLR , that registration of a marriage under this section will not ipso facto make the marriage valid, if it is otherwise invalid and a suit for declaration that the marriage is invalid is maintainable. Judicial Separation: The provision for the judicial separation is provided under Section 10 of the Hindu. K Marriage Act, M thereof, as grounds on which a petition for divorce might have been presented.

Where a decree for judicial separation has been passed, it shall no longer be Obligatory for the. A and on being satisfied of the truth of the statements made in such petition rescind the decree if it. It is considered to be a lesser evil as it leaves open the door 'or.

K reconciliation. Judicial separation puts the obligation of cohabitation to an end, although it does not affect the marital relationship. Therefore, as soon as the decree under Section 10 is passed the parties to marriage are relieved of the duty to live together and co-habit, but any act of cohabitation between the 'two would neutralise the effect of decree and their normal marital life is restored.

In this sense it is different from divorce in which the relationship of husband and wife ceases to exist. The object of the provision is mainly to give time to the spouses for approachment and reconciliation.

The effect of an order under this section granting judicial separation is to permit spouses to live apart and to afford an opportunity to reconcile. For the application of the section a valid marriage must subsist between the parties. Where the relationship of marriage is denied, the factum of marriage and its solemnisation has to be proved by the petitioner.

Grounds for Judicial Separation: The grounds for taking recourse under this section are the same as that of divorce provided under Section 13 1 of the Act. These are the common ground for both the husband and wife.

These common grounds are as follows: That the other party has, after solemnisation of marriage, voluntary sexual intercourse with any person other than his or her spouse Or. Other party has deserted the petitioner for a continuous period not less than two years immediately preceding the presentation of petition; or.

Other party has been incurably of unsound mind, or has been suffering continuously or intermittently from mental disorder of such a nature and to such an extent that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with the respondent. In this clause. U a the expression "mental disorder" means mental illness or an arrested on incomplete development of mind, psychopathic disorder any other disorder or disability of mind and includes schizophrenia. K m irresponsible conduct on the part of the other party and whether not.

Other party has been suffering from venereal disease of communicable form; or a 7. M m Other party has been suffering from a virulent and incurable form of leprosy; or. A d Other party has not been heard of as being alive for a period of 7 years or more by those persons. The old Hindu law believed that the marital tie could not be severed under any circumstances whatsoever. Manu does not approve of dissolution of "marriage in any condition. The provision of divorce under Hindu law has brought about a radical change in the concept of Hindu marriage.

Divorce puts the marriage to an end, parties revert back to their unmarried status and are once again: Tee to marry. Section 13 of the Act describes the circumstances which extend the right of divorce. Section 14 says that no petition for divorce can be presented within one year of the marriage unless it causes exceptional. S hardship to the petitioner or it becomes a case of exceptional depravity on the part if the respondent. Section 15 of the Act lays down the limitations on the right of divorced persons to l1arry again.

The Marriage Laws Amendment Act. An aggrieved party, if he or she so chooses may choose for divorce or judicial separation. U Amendment a new mode of divorce i. Section 13 B is remarkable in the sense that it has substantially eroded the sacramental character of Hindu Marriage. Besides the common grounds enumerated under Section 13 1 and 13 b there are some specific grounds available only to a wife as a ground for divorce or Judicial separation under Section.

A lawful marriage can be dissolved by presenting a petition for divorce by either party to marriage on any of the following grounds: M a Adultery: Before the coming into force of the Marriage Laws Amendment Act, "living in. On the other hand, a petitioner could obtain a decree of judicial. Now adultery simplicitor has been made ground of.

A divorce as well as of judicial separation. Clause i of Section 13 1 runs as" has after the solemnization. To establish. Only this much is required to be established that the respondent has willfully indulged into sexual intercourse with a. K person other than his or her spouse. For instance in Rajendra Agarwal v.

Sharda Devi M.

It need not be proved that the respondent has been living in adultery. In Sanjuka Padhan v. At about 1 a. In this way she was away from her parental home and when her father in law went to call her back she bolted herself inside a room and visited her marital home no further. The Court under the circumstances, found sufficient circumstantial evidence for adultery and granted the decree for divorce. In another case Chandrawati v. Kailash Nath 1 AI R All , the husband filed a petition for divorce on the ground of adultery and tendered in evidence an admission letter written by the unchaste wife dated two years earlier, the Court held that it would amount to condonation of bad conduct of the wife as he had later continued to live as husband and wife.

The burden of proof is on the petitioner. In Chander Prakash v. Sudesh Kumari AIR. Under clause i a of Section 13 1 "cruelty" is a ground for divorce.

This provision has been inserted by the Marriage Laws Amendment Act This provision provides that divorce can be granted on the ground of cruelty if the other party has, after the solemnisation of marriage treated the petitioner with cruelty. The expression "cruelty" is not defined in the Act. In Russel v. Russel in the year Lopes, LJ has defined cruelty as "there must be danger to life, limb or health, bodily or mental or a reasonable apprehension of it.

Recently, in Rajan Vasant Revan Kar v. S spouse to live together. Cruelty includes both physical and mental cruelty. So far as physical cruelty is concerned what acts of physical violence will amount to cruelty will differ from case to case, depending upon the susceptibility.

U and sensibility of the party concerned. A single act of violence may not amount to cruelty. A solitary incident of beating resulting in minor injuries cannot be said as an act of cruelty. In Bhagat v. In other words,. K mental cruelty must be of such a nature that the parties cannot reasonably be expected to live together.

Balasubramanian v. Vuyalakshmi Balasubramanian AIR. But the court observed. Hanumath Rao v. Ramani AIR. A magnitude that it severs the bond between the husband and wife and as a result of which it becomes. Mere removal of mangalsutra by the wife does not amount to mental cruelty. False accusations of adultery or unchastity-For instance in Samptami v.

Jagdish Cal. Persistent refusal to have marital intercourse amounts to cruelty. Prosecution of a spouse by the other of a false criminal charge amounts to cruelty. Persistent charges of immorality against the husband and causing injuries to the husband and filing complaints against the husband amount to cruelty.

False, defamatory, malicious, baseless and unapproved allegations made against the spouse to superior officers or authority amount to cruelty.

Making false charge of adultery in the cross-examination of the wife does not amount to cruelty. Mere allegation of impotence against the wife is not cruelty. The wife telling the husband on the first wedding night that he had and that persons with ugly face have also an ugly mind, does not amount to cruelty as understood in matrimonial law. Outburst of temper without rancour, non payment of interim maintenance or desertion per-se, does.

The clause was added by the Marriage Laws Amendment Act, It provides "Desertion" for a period of two years, as one of the grounds for divorce. It is the total repudiation of the obligations of marriage. It is the intentional permanent forsaking and abandonment of one spouse by the other without that other's consent and without reasonable cause.

Desertion may be actual, constructive or it may be by wilfull neglect. U S that the desertion was without reasonable cause and without the consent or against the wish of the petitioner.

In other words, two important elements are essential to constitute desertion, viz. Further, the offence of desertion is complete only after the period of two years is spent.

For instance in the case of Anand Prakash Dixit v.

P , the petition for divorce. K on the ground of desertion presented before the expiry of two years was dismissed as premature. Mere physical. Intention must be to end cohabitation permanently. In Sunil. Kumar v. M the matrimonial home and reign of terror prevailing there drove her out. It was held that she was not. A husband should establish independent matrimonial home where she would live with him as the other. Bhawna v. K and on her opaque allegation of misconduct as to demand of more dowry by her father in-law and use of taunting language in the little period of her stay in her marital home, she started living away from her husband, it was held to be a case of desertion by the wife.

In Madan Mohan v. Recently, in Rajosh v. Rukmini, the divorce petition was filed by the husband on the ground of desertion. Wife states that she was driven out by the husband and she was ready to co-habit with husband. The husband's explanation was not satisfactory for divorce.

The Court held that husband cannot be permitted to take the benefit of his own wrong so the decree for divorce cannot be granted on the ground of desertion.

Section 13 1 ii States that if a spouse has ceased to be a Hindu, by conversion to another religion, the other spouse can obtain divorce under this clause. The conversion of the respondent to a non-Hindu faith does not amount to automatic dissolution of marriage.

The petitioner has to file a petition to obtain a decree of divorce.

If a petitioner chooses to continue to live with his spouse who has converted to another religion, there is nothing to debar him from doing so. Under clause iii of Section 13 1 a petitioner may get a decree of divorce or judicial separation if the respondent "has been suffering continuously or intermittently from mental disorder of such a kind and to such an extent that the petitioner can not reasonably be expected to live with the respondent.

Accordingly, it means mental illness, arrested or incomplete development of mind, psychopathic disorder or any other disorder or disability of mind and includes schizophrenia. It was held by the Supreme Court in Ram. S Narayan Gupta v. Rameshwari AIR S. Alka v. Abhinesh AIR M.

U entitled for divorce. The Marriage Laws Amendment Act, has made leprosy a ground both for judicial separation and divorce. No duration of leprosy is specified. Under clause iv the petitioner is required to. K show that the respondent has been suffering from virulent and incurable leprosy, thus two conditions are necessary: The venereal diseases are only such diseases which are communicated by.

Section 13 1 v requires that the disease must be in a communicable form. A M yn a m Renunciation of the World: Section 13 1 vi provides a right for having divorce if the other spouse has renounced the world by entering any religious order. Spouse not Heard for Seven Years: Under Section 13 1 vii if spouse has not been heard of as. This clause is based on the rule of evidence contained in Section of Indian Evidence Act. K Non-resumption of Cohabitation: Sub-section 1 A of Section 13 provides that whether the marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of this Act either party to the marriage may present a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce provided there has been no resumption of cohabitation between the parties for a period of 1 year or upwards after the passing of the decree for judicial separation and where there has been no restitution of conjugal rights between the parties for a period of 1 year or upwards after the passing of the decree for restitution of conjugal rights.

It was held In Tulsa Bai v. The one year period has to be noted from the date the decree becomes final. It was held in Shruti 3enedee v. Tapan Kumar Banerjee Cal. However, in Sukhvinder Kaur v. Dilbagh Singh, Punj.

LR it was laid down that "'here the trial court had dismissed the petition for restitution of conjugal rights and the decree was passed by the appellant court,. Grounds Available to the Wife Only: That in the case of a marriage solemnized before the commencement of the Act i.

That the husband has been guilty of rape, sodomy or bestiality after the solemnization of marriage. That in a suit under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, or in a proceedings under Section of the. U d Option of Puberty [Section 13 2 iv ]: That the wife's marriage was solemnized before she attained the age of fifteen years and she repudiated the marriage after attaining that age but before attaining the age of eighteen years, whether the marriage has been consummated or not.

That both the parties have been living separately for a period of one year or more. That both the parties have not been able to live together. That both the parties have mutually agreed that their marriage should be dissolved. Divorce has not been made easy and at least m one year should have elapsed between the date of marriage and the presentation of a divorce petition. But a a petition may be filed within this period, if so permitted by the court on an application being made to it on the.

After passing the decree of divorce, the parties to the marriage, may marry again, if the following conditions are satisfied- 1. When a marriage has been dissolved and there is no appeal against the decree of court.

If there is such a right of appeal but the time has been expired without filing an appeal. An appeal has been filed but has been dismissed. Under the general law, a legitimate child is one who is born in a lawful wedlock, and a child born out of a void marriage is necessarily a bastard.

This would normally cause great hardship to a child for no fault of his own and therefore this section provides that notwithstanding that a marriage is null and void under Section 11 or a decree is granted in respect of a voidable marriage under Section 12, a child born is deemed to be the legitimate child of his parents, including rights of inheritance and succession. Punishment of Bigamy Section If at the date of such marriage, either party has a husband or wife. Court to Which Petition shall be Presented Section Every petition under this code shall be presented to the District Court within the local limits of whose ordinary original civil jurisdiction -.

U b in case the wife is the petitioner, where she is residing on the date of presentation of the petition; 4. K a is at that time residing outside the territories to which the Act extends, or. M Contents and Verification of Petitions Section The petition for any relief must distinctly set out the. It must also state except in a petition.

The statements contained. A which plaints have to be verified, and such statements may be referred to as evidence at the time of the hearing. Except as otherwise provided by the Act, all. K matters of procedure under the Act are to be regulated by the C. The Act also confers on the High Court, the power to make rules regulating the procedure to be adopted. Section 21A of the Act provides that if a Petition under the Act has been presented to a District Court for judicial separation under Section 10 or for divorce under Section 13 , and subsequently another petition is presented by the other party to the marriage for judicial separation or for divorce, in the same District Court, or in a different District Court, in the same State or in a different State -.

Section 21 B provides that the trial of a petition under the Act should, as far as is practicable, consistently with the interests of justice, be continued from day to day until its conclusion, unless the Court finds the adjournment of the trial beyond the following day to be necessary, and records the reasons for doing so.

It is further provided that all petitions and appeals are to be disposed of as expeditiously as possible, and an endeavour is to be made to dispose of a petition within six months from the date of service of the notice of the petition on the Respondent, and an appeal within three months from the date of the service of the notice of the appeal on the Respondent.

Documentary Evidence Section 21 C: Section 21 C provides that notwithstanding anything in any enactment to the contrary, no document shall be inadmissible in evidence in any proceeding at the trial of a. S petition under the Act on the ground that it is not duly stamped or registered. Hearing in Camera Section The general rule of law is that every Court of justice is open to every person, and that all suits including matrimonial suits should be heard in open Courts.

Account Options

This rule is subject to. U certain limitations, and it was, therefore, formerly provided that a proceeding under the Act was to be conducted in camera -. K b if the court so thought fit. M Further, it is also not lawful for any person to print or publish any matter in relation to any such proceeding,. There are certain conditions which the court must take into account. The Court before granting the relief should fully satisfy.

Follow the Author

K itself that some established rule of relief exists and the petitioner is not in any way taking advantage of his or, her own wrong. Absence of Connivance and Condonation: There should not be any connivance with respondent, or the plaintiff should not have condoned the acts of the respondent. Absence of Collusion: The petition must not be presented or prosecuted in collusion with the respondent.

No Unreasonable Delay: There should not be any unnecessary or improper delay in instituting the proceeding. In any proceeding for divorce. Where in any proceeding under this Act, it appears to the Court that either the wife or the husband, as the case may be, has no independent income sufficient for her or his support and the necessary expenses of the proceeding, it may, on the application of the wife or the husband, order the respondent to pay to the petitioner the expenses of the proceeding, and monthly, during the proceeding, such sum as, having regard to the petitioner's own income and the income of the respondent, it may seem to the Court to be reasonable.

U S Any Court exercising jurisdiction under this Act may, at the time of passing any decree or at any time subsequent thereto, on application made to it for the purpose by either the wife or the husband, as the case may be, order that the respondent shall pay to the applicant, for her or his maintenance and support, such gross sum or such monthly or periodical sum for a term not exceeding the life of the applicant as, having regard to the respondent's own income and other property, if any, the income and.

K other property of the applicant, the conduct of the parties and other circumstances of the case, it may. If the Court is satisfied that there is a change in the circumstances of either party at any time after it a. M has made an order under sub-section 1 , it may, at the instance of either party, vary, modify or rescind. If the Court is satisfied that the party in whose favour an order has been made under this section has. A remarried or, if such party is the wife, that she has not remained chaste or, if such party is the husband,.

K Custody of Children Section In any proceeding under this Act, the Court may, from time to time, pass such interim orders and make such provisions in the decree as it may deem just and proper with respect to the custody, maintenance and education of minor children, consistently with their wishes, wherever possible, and may alter the decree upon application by petition for the purpose, make from time to time, all such orders and provisions with respect to the custody, maintenance and education of such children as might have been made by such decree or interim orders in case the proceeding for Obtaining such decree were still pending, and the Court may, also from time to time revoke, suspend or vary any such orders and provisions previously made.

Disposal of Property Section In any proceeding under this Act, the Court may make such provisions in the decree, as it deems just and proper, with respect to any property presented, at or about the time of marriage, which may belong jointly to both the husband and the wife.

All decrees made by the court in any proceeding under this Act shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section 3 , be appealable as decrees of the Court made in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction, and every such appeal shall lie to the Court to which appeals ordinarily lie from the decisions of the Court given in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction. Orders made by the Court in any proceeding under this Act, under Section 25 or Section 26 shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section 3 , be appealable if they are not interim orders, and every such appeal shall lie to the Court to which appeals ordinarily lie from the decision of the Court given in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction.

Every appeal under this section shall be preferred within a period of thirty days from the date of the decree or order. U proceeding under this Act shall be enforced in the like manner as the decrees and orders of the Court made in the exercise of its original civil jurisdiction for the time being are enforced. K c o m A marriage solemnized between Hindus before the commencement of this Act, which is otherwise.

M parties thereto belonged to the same gotra or parivar or belonged to different religions, castes or sub-.

Nothing contained in this Act shall be deemed to affect any right recognised by custom, or conferred. A by any special enactment, to obtain the dissolution of a Hindu marriage, whether solemnized before or.

Then you can start reading site books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no site device required. Would you like to tell us about a lower price? If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?

Save Extra with 3 offers. Frequently bought together. Total price: Add all three to Cart. One of these items is dispatched sooner than the other. Show details. download the selected items together This item: Further information: Hinduism The word Hindu is derived from the Indo-Aryan [21] and Sanskrit [21] [5] word Sindhu, which means "a large body of water", covering "river, ocean".

The actual term 'hindu' first occurs, states Gavin Flood, as "a Persian geographical term for the people who lived beyond the river Indus Sanskrit: Sindhu ", [5] more specifically in the 6th-century BCE inscription of Darius I. Among the earliest known records of 'Hindu' with connotations of religion may be in the 7th-century CE Chinese text Record of the Western Regions by the Buddhist scholar Xuanzang.

Xuanzang uses the transliterated term In-tu whose "connotation overflows in the religious" according to Arvind Sharma. Slowly, the Indian groups themselves started using the term, differentiating themselves and their "traditional ways" from those of the invaders. These texts used it to contrast Hindus from Muslims who are called Yavanas foreigners or Mlecchas barbarians , with the 16th-century Chaitanya Charitamrita text and the 17th-century Bhakta Mala text using the phrase "Hindu dharma ".

Medieval-era usage 8th to 18th century One of the earliest but ambiguous uses of the word Hindu is, states Arvind Sharma , in the 'Brahmanabad settlement' which Muhammad ibn Qasim made with non-Muslims after the Arab invasion of northwestern Sindh region of India, in CE.These different schools have the same fundamental principles and acknowledge the supreme authority of the Mitakshara, but differ in matters of details, especially in the.

Partition consists in defining the shares of the coparceners in the joint property; an actual division of the property by metes and bounds is not necessary. If any person is disqualified from inheriting any property under this Act, it shall devolve as if such person had died before the intestate. Daughter of a predeceased daughter of a predeceased daughter.

For the purposes of determining the order of succession among agnates or cognates, relationship. According to Narada and Parasara, there are only five conditions in which a wife could abandon her husband and remarry - 1.

Rule 3 - The heirs in the branch of each predeceased son or each predeceased daughter of the intestate shall take between them one share. As the British colonial rule took over the political and administrative powers in India, it was faced with various state responsibilities such as legislative and judiciary functions.